Employment Agreement Good Cause

To use the example described above, a 90-day period, perhaps even 60 days after the restoration that the CEO must move to Ohio should be enough to decide whether she stays at NEWC (after exercising her right to leave for “good reason”) or to retain her position and go to Akron. The employer must rightly know that if it changes with the company, it will not be able to change its mind two years later, citing “Good Reason” as the reason for moving to Manhattan. So look at the date of the work agreement for executives. From the point of view of the association, however, too narrow a definition of causes carries a considerable risk. In such a case, the board of directors, if it finds that it must remove the officer in the best interest of the organization, may be obliged to pay a significant severance package. In another common scenario, a board may attempt to stretch an ambiguous definition of causes to cover its reasons for terminating the executive`s employment. The dismissed executive then implements the board`s interpretation, and the organization is involved in a costly breach of action. Carefully developed redundancy provisions in executive employment contracts can avoid such results. These provisions should improve the executive`s direction and emphasize both the clarity and maintenance of the association`s reputation and the long-term health of the association.

What makes the “right reason” must be adapted to the individual circumstances of each executive, but here are some “good reasons”: enter the precious term “good reason”: the idea that there may be one or more specified reasons – all of which are carefully defined in the executive`s employment contract – that allow the executive to leave on its own and recover its severance pay. Dismissal rightly puts the employee in a much better position than he would be under the Texas employment rule. The parties may explicitly state in the contract that the employer must have a good reason to dismiss the worker or that this may be implicit in the agreement. For example, a fixed-term contract, which does not mention a good thing, is generally designed to provide relief for a good cause. Under Texas law, this is a good reason why the worker does not perform the tasks that a person would generally be prudent in the industry in similar circumstances. However, since this definition is vague, the parties should explicitly state in their employment contract what is a good thing. However, a good reason is generally not dissatisfaction with worker`s work or economic reduction in violence. Other definitions of common causes, even in narrow agreements, include the conviction of a crime related to the functions of the executive. Given the timing of many criminal prosecutions, these provisions are often insufficient, too late. A stricter provision would define the case on the basis of the underlying act or omission that is contrary to criminal law and relates to the association.

Comments are closed.