Gl Collective Agreement

In this context, and in line with the recently concluded/signed agreements, an extension of the definition of family, as proposed here, would be appropriate for the SV group as part of an overall comparison. In its approach to collective bargaining and collective agreement renewal, the employer`s objective is to ensure fair compensation for workers while respecting its overall fiscal responsibility and obligations to government and Canadian priorities. 113 A collective agreement applicable to a unit of collective agreements, other than a tariff unit determined in accordance with section 238.14, may not, directly or indirectly, modify or eliminate an existing condition of employment or set a new condition of employment if, during the last round of collective bargaining (2014-2018), the negotiator was notified during the negotiations that the ITP was repealed. came into effect on the date of signature of the new SV agreement and the employer wanted to negotiate the methodology for calculating ITRs to replace the ITRP. For similar periods, the Canadian government negotiated with 34 groups in the federal public service economic wage increases of 1.75% per year, as well as targeted wage measures of about 1% over the life of the agreement. Through sound and good faith negotiations, the Government of Canada reached 34 agreements during this round of negotiations covering more than 65,000 federal public service employees. These include comparisons with 15 different bargaining agents, representing 17 bargaining units at CAP and 17 employee groups in separate agencies. The employer considers that the SV agreement is a successful agreement that does not require major changes. As a result, the employer is presenting a reduced set of proposals that includes modest economic increases and changes to leave plans that are tailored to what was agreed with 34 other groups in the current round of bargaining. This proposal is a duplication of the provisions contained in the program and management services (PA) agreement – Article 28.07: Recall from a remote site. The negotiator is trying to remove the notion of a 12-hour shift from Annex D to the agreement.

The employer`s intention, with the repeal of the ITRP, was not to eliminate the ITD, but to break the link with the classification. The employer wanted to negotiate, in the last round of collective agreements, a new calculation method that would come into force with the signing of the last SV contract (June 14, 2017); However, the parties have not reached agreement on this issue. The joint study was completed in March 2015. During the negotiations, the parties had a very different understanding of the results of the study. This study did not provide the common information base originally planned. Nevertheless, on February 4, 2017, the parties reached a provisional agreement (Annex #8) which resulted in the signing of a collective agreement on June 14, 2017. It is clear from the settlement signed by both parties that the wage adjustments agreed during the negotiations have “resolved the issues identified in the joint study”. .

. .

Comments are closed.